Text
Editionsbericht
Literatur: Eliot
Literatur: Eliot-Rezeption
Literatur: The New Statesman
We may therefore formulate as follows: the ghost of some simple metre should lurk behind the arras in even the "freest" verse; to advance menacingly as we doze, and withdraw as we rouse. Or, freedom is only truly freedom when it appears against the background of an artificial limitation.
[..]
And this liberation from rhyme might be as well a liberation of rhyme. Freed from its exacting task of supporting lame verse, it could be applied with greater effect where it is most needed. There are often passages in an unrhymed poem where rhyme is wanted for some special effect, for a sudden tightening-up, for a cumulative insistence, or for an abrupt change of mood. But formal rhymed verse will certainly not lose its place. We only need the coming of a Satirist – no man of genius is rarer – to prove that the heroic couplet has lost none of its edge since Dryden and Pope laid it down. As for the sonnet I am not so sure. But the decay of intricate formal patterns has nothing to do with the advent of vers libre. It had set in long before. Only in a closely-knit and homogeneous society, where many men are at work on the same problems, such a society as those which produced the Greek chorus, the Elizabethan lyric, and the Troubadour canzone, will the development of such forms ever be carried to perfection. And as for vers libre, we conclude that it is not defined by absence of pattern or absence of rhyme, for other verse is without these; that it is not defined by non-existence of metre, since even the worst verse can be scanned; and we conclude that the division between Conservative Verse and Vers Libre does not exist, for there is only good verse, bad verse, and chaos.
Erstdruck und Druckvorlage
New Statesman.
A Weekly Review of Politics and Literature.
Bd. 8, 1917, Nr. 204, 3. März, S. 518-519.
Gezeichnet: T. S. Eliot.
Unser Auszug: S. 519.
Die Textwiedergabe erfolgt nach dem ersten Druck
(Editionsrichtlinien).
New Statesman online
URL: https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/009663938
Zeitschriften-Repertorium
Kommentierte und kritische Ausgabe
Literatur: Eliot
Brandmeyer, Rudolf: Poetiken der Lyrik: Von der Normpoetik zur Autorenpoetik.
In: Handbuch Lyrik. Theorie, Analyse, Geschichte.
Hrsg. von Dieter Lamping.
2. Aufl. Stuttgart 2016, S. 2-15.
Callison, Jamie: Transmuting F. H. Bradley.
T. S. Eliot's Notes Towards a Theory of Poetry.
In: T. S. Eliot Studies Annual 1 (2017), S. 99-113.
Chinitz, David E. (Hrsg.): A Companion to T. S. Eliot.
Chicester 2014.
Ferreira, Carla S.: Seeing through French Eyes:
Vers Libre in Whitman, Laforgue, and Eliot.
In: Cambridge Quarterly 45.1 (2016), S. 20-41.
Glaser, Ben: Modernism's Metronome.
Meter and Twentieth-Century Poetics.
Baltimore 2020.
Gallup, Donald: T. S. Eliot.
A Bibliography.
London 1969.
Hall, Jason D. (Hrsg.): Meter Matters.
Verse Cultures of the Long Nineteenth Century.
Athens 2011.
Linarès, Serge: Le front poétique en 1917.
In: Littérature 188 (2017), S. 8-27.
Lipking, Lawrence: Poet-critics. In: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism.
Bd. 7: Modernism and the New Criticism. Hrsg. von A. Walton Litz.
Cambridge u.a. 2000, S. 439-467.
Marcus, Laura: Rhythmical Subjects.
The Measures of the Modern.
Oxford 2023.
Martin, Meredith: The Rise and Fall of Meter.
Poetry and English National Culture, 1860-1930.
Princeton u.a. 2012.
Pondrom, Cyrena N.: The Road from Paris.
French Influence on English Poetry, 1900 – 1920.
Cambridge 2010.
Stayer, Jayme (Hrsg.): T. S. Eliot, France, and the Mind of Europe.
Newcastle upon Tyne 2015.
Sullivan, Hannah: 'But We Must Learn to Take Literature Seriously':
T. S. Eliot and the Little Magazines of Modernism, 1917-1920.
In: Critical Quarterly 46.2 (2004), S. 63-90.
Thaventhiran, Helen: T. S. Eliot as Literary Critic.
In: The New Cambridge Companion to T. S. Eliot.
Hrsg. von Jason Harding.
Cambridge 2017, S. 131-144.
Literatur: Eliot-Rezeption
Boecker, Bettina: "Zuspruch inmitten Sinnlosigkeit":
Zur Rezeption T. S. Eliots im Deutschland der Nachkriegszeit.
In: Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 55.2 (2007), S. 139-154.
Brooker, Jewel S. (Hrsg.): T. S. Eliot. The Contemporary Reviews.
Cambridge u.a. 2004.
Däumer, Elisabeth / Bagchee, Shyamal (Hrsg.):
The International Reception of T. S. Eliot.
London u.a. 2007.
Gish, Nancy K.: Eliot's Critical Reception:
"The Quintessence of Twenty-First-Century Poetry".
In: A Companion to T. S. Eliot.
Hrsg. von David E. Chinitz.
Chicester 2014, S. 436-448.
Grant, Michael (Hrsg.): T. S. Eliot.
The Critical Heritage.
2 Bde. London u.a. 1982.
Harding, Jason (Hrsg.): T. S. Eliot in Context.
Cambridge u.a. 2011.
Leucht, Robert: "Oder ist es seine magnetische Kraft?"
T.S. Eliot in Österreich -
Bausteine einer literarischen Rezeptionsgeschichte, 1945-1981.
In: Angermion 10 (2017), S. 147-179.
Marx, William: T.S. Eliot in France. Une réception problématique.
In: Textuel. L'UFR de Lettres, arts et cinéma 53 (2008), S. 89-95.
Rasula, Jed: What the Thunder Said.
How The Waste Land Made Poetry Modern.
Princeton, NJ 2022.
Literatur: The New Statesman
Cowley, Jason (Hrsg.): Statesmanship:
The Best of the New Statesman, 1913-2019.
London 2019.
Smith, Adrian: The New Statesman.
Portrait of a Political Weekly, 1913 - 1931.
London 1996.
Kap. 8: 'Literature is news that STAYS news' (Ezra Pound):
The New Statesman as a literary review.
Edition
Lyriktheorie » R. Brandmeyer